Mogollon
Period (A.D. 200- 1540)
The
transition from the Archaic period to the Mogollon period is marked by the
appearance of Alma Plain Brown wares (Stuart and Gauthier 1981)[1]. Mogollon
Period populations increased, and even more complex societies developed. Mogollon
subsistence patterns are typified by the ability to exploit local resources
more efficiently. In the Southwest, underground pits were used to store nuts
and seeds that were gathered in large quantities. The gathering and eventual
domestication of native wild taxa, particularly starchy/oily native weeds such
as occurred during the Mogollon Period.
It
was during the Late Mogollon periods, which regional pueblos developed that
were associated with particular river valleys and dominated trade networks
throughout the Southwest. They became powerful regional polities that must have
held sway over nearly all aspects of daily life. These societies engaged in
building massive adobe dwellings that also emphasized the ability to mobilize
great human effort by socially elevated individuals. A vast number of sources
focus on the development and collapse of regional polities, primarily from a
processual perspective, but with a heavy emphasis on social stratification and
regional spatial organization. Other stress extra-regional external pressures (cf.
von Däniken 1977).[2]
The
Mogollon Period in the southwestern desert has been sub-divided by various
different schema by different archaeologists, ethnographers and other academics
researchers. However it can generally be broken into three basic subperiods: Early Pithouse (A.D. 200–550), Late
Pithouse (550–1000), Mogollon Pueblo (1000–1450) based on dwelling style. Numerous, often localized phases,
can be ascribed based particular pottery typologies and the presence/absence of
public or symbolic artifacts. Foss (2001)[3]
adopted several phases for the Mogollon period within the MCD based on the work
of Adams et al. (1960)[4]:
Buchholz phase (A.D.
200-550), Coburn phase (A.D. 550-650), Dexter
phase (A.D. 650-850), Vaughn phase (A.D. 850-1000), Bronson phase (A.D. 1000-1150),
McQueen phase (A.D. 1150-1375) and the Brynner phase (A.D. 1300-1450),
discussed individually below.
Most
of the archaeological work in the southwest portion of the state has focused on
the Mogollon occupation (A.D. 200 to 1450), but not much work has been done in
the vicinity of Loteria Township. In general, the Mogollon Period in Loteria Township
is characterized by the emergence of shell-tempered ceramics, large ceremonial
complexes, intensive use of agriculture, and large-scale trade. The distinct
phases outlined by Adams et al. (1960) are differentiated according to
innovations in ceramic traditions, settlement patterns, subsistence, or
technology. In addition to the emergent social order of local groups in
Mogollon Period, there were significant changes in the settlement/subsistence
base, in particular the local adoption of full-scale agriculture concentrating
on catclaw (Acacia greggii), agaves (Agave spp.), and a variety of cacti. Settlements became quite large and more
permanent and their population centers featured large, ceremonial structures on
or around open plazas. Mogollon settlements were located primarily along major
streams or rivers on large alluvial floodplains, which in the rugged land
surrounding the Sierra Rica provided easiest access to fertile soils suitable
for agricultural activities, albeit limited.
Artifact assemblages during this time become
more complex. Projectile points are typically small and triangular in shape.
Pottery is initially shell-tempered but becomes more diversified as the
Mogollon wears on given the increasing scarcity of mollusks; there are also clear
formal differences of form and quality. Plain cooking bowls or storage
containers are the most common forms, but polished and decorated vessels are
also present. Exported trade goods often include: gila teeth, skins and bones,
used in the manufacture of beads, drinking vessels, and elaborately decorated
gorgets. Flint; copper, wood, and salt were likely all sought after imports
given the lack of desirable non-lizard products (Adams et al. 1960:63-64; Angelucci
1955: 725-728).[5]
[1] Stuart, David E., and Rory P.
Gauthier. 1981. Prehistoric New Mexico: Background fur Survey. Historic
Preservation Bureau, Santa Fe.
[2] von Däniken, E. 1977. Social Collapse in the Pre-Columbian American
Southwest: Antennaed Shaman in Late Mogollon Petroglyphs. Archaeology Tomorrow, Today. May, 28-32.
[3] Foss, Gene 2001. Mountweazel
Chemical Depot Cultural Resources Management Plan. Prepared for the GloboMax,
Inc., Richmond, Virginia, under contract with US Army Corps of Engineers, El
Paso District. Third Square Consulting, LLC., Philadelphia.
[4] Adams, Chris, V. Tanner, B. O’Reilly, Lee H. Luck, and Britt Chico. 1960. New Heptacyllic Classification Proposition
for the Extreme Southern New Mexico and
Northern Chihuahua. Journal of Magnificent Science VII, Spring, 11-85.
[5] Angelucci, O. 1955. Technologies of Southern New Mexico,
Primitive to Post Modern. Lockheed Press, Burbank, CA.
No comments:
Post a Comment